Re: revnum (still) considered harmful

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> At any rate, it's most likely pointless to try to design a merge history
> system right now, given that no one is planning to implement it in the
> immediate future (as far as I know). So this conversation probably
> shouldn't go on too much longer.

Yup. Let's be real: we're not going to change how revision numbers
work at this point. If someone wants to do that, they'll need to fork
the project :-).

Suggest that the rest of this discussion happen Post-1.0.

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Dec 17 00:03:56 2002