RE: repository GUIDs
From: Bill Tutt <rassilon_at_lyra.org>
Date: 2002-12-12 21:43:11 CET
It feels right, but sometimes it's necessary to cluster an index on an
The new table under discussion is an example of wanting to index a table
Searching for Businesses in a Yellow Pages system:
Both of these approaches are slightly counter intuitive, but they do
FYI,
---- Do you want a dangerous fugitive staying in your flat? No. Well, don't upset him and he'll be a nice fugitive staying in your flat. > -----Original Message----- > From: Karl Fogel [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net] > Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 11:36 AM > To: mark benedetto king > Cc: Branko ?ibej; Bill Tutt; dev@subversion.tigris.org > Subject: Re: repository GUIDs > > mark benedetto king <bking@answerfriend.com> writes: > > Performance considerations aside, the table would not be > > just another layer of indirection. Here's a proposed table: > > Thanks for the extra context, that helps. > > But, still, it would be simpler if the key were the GUID, and the rest > of the information were the value, no? The whole point of the GUID is > to be a "primary key" of sorts for that repository, in the Grand > Universal Database That Is The Internet. It just feels right to use > the PK as the PK, if I may phrase it prejudicially :-). > > -K --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Dec 12 21:43:47 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.