Re: svn_wc_status_unversioned and svn_wc_status_none

Jon Middleton <jjm@ixtab.org.uk> writes:
> I seem to have misread svn_wc_status - after looking it some more, it
> seems that svn_wc_status does not construct (and then use) the ignore
> list so that it set no_ignore to the correct value when calling
> assemble_status.
>
> I should be able to do this next week, but I'm busy for the rest of
> this week. Would such a patch be acceptable ?

At this point, there's so much context here that I'm not sure exactly
what you're proposing :-).

Could you write up a short spec that says how Subversion behaves now,
versus how it would behave after your patch? Target audience for the
spec is someone who has read the svn book, but not this thread.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Dec 9 22:47:20 2002