[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn_wc_status_unversioned and svn_wc_status_none

From: Jon Middleton <jjm_at_ixtab.org.uk>
Date: 2002-12-09 22:36:43 CET

On Mon, Dec 09, 2002 at 06:59:23PM +0000, Jon Middleton wrote:
> I've had a look at the patch (r3746) and at the svn_wc_status
> function. As svn_wc_status is likely to be called with a filename (as
> I'm doing from the swig bindings) it would be nice if it defaulted to
> no_ignore=True for assemble_status, so that ignored files get the
> right status set, or if this is not possible a no_ignore option is
> added so there a svn_wc_statuses like..

I seem to have misread svn_wc_status - after looking it some more, it
seems that svn_wc_status does not construct (and then use) the ignore
list so that it set no_ignore to the correct value when calling

I should be able to do this next week, but I'm busy for the rest of
this week. Would such a patch be acceptable ?

"First things first -- but not necessarily in that order"
                -- The Doctor, "Doctor Who"		

  • application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
Received on Mon Dec 9 22:37:32 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.