Re: Entries caching & Performance

>
>
>>The other half of the time spent comes from ne_xml_parse. I am not
>>sure how this could be made faster short of replacing expat with
>>something faster.
>>
>>
>
>Does "half" here really mean the 5% (i.e., 81% - 76%)? If so, it's
>not worth worrying about. The entries caching is the big game.
>
>
I suspect we will know more once entries caching is in. This may not be
as big of a deal if entries caching makes us more cache coherent. (no
pun intended).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 26 04:03:22 2002