Re: [PATCH] fs patch was vtable-fi-cation of the fs

On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 16:44, Glenn A. Thompson wrote:
> hey,
>
> Karl Fogel wrote:
>
> >"Glenn A. Thompson" <gthompson@cdr.net> writes:

.. Snip...

> >That's pretty big patch. May take a while for someone to get to (as
> >you were probably aware), just wanted to say so up front...
> >
> You think? :-)
>
> No Problemo. It does pass the test suite on my box. But if there is
> other testing you want me to put it through just let me know.
> I have a separate wc just for this patch. Until someone "yays or nays
> it" I'll keep it synced up with Head as best I can. If I get conflicts
> I'll post fixes as additional links on the same web page.
> Is this an OK way to go?

Branches are good. Any compelling reason it's not on a seperate branch
that's sync'ed with changes on the trunk? IMHO it'd be easier for
others too keep in sync/review if they had an interest. Other then the
commit logs going out to the poor modem users, I don't see the downside
to it.

        Kirby

>
> gat
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>

-- 
Real Programmers view electronic multimedia files with a hex editor.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org