[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn ls question

From: Paul Lussier <pll_at_lanminds.com>
Date: 2002-11-21 16:58:09 CET

>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, "pll" == pll@lanminds.com wrote:

  pll> Why 'svn ls -v' and not 'svn ls -l'?

>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, "Rafael" == Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:

  Rafael> Consistency, I believe. -v is an option that many svn
  Rafael> subcommands understand ; -l is not

>>>>> On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, "Garrett" == Garrett Rooney wrote:

  Garrett> since we already have a prefectly good 'verbose' flag, we
  Garrett> decided to use that in 'svn ls', rather than wasting '-l',
  Garrett> which might prove useful later.

Fare enough, consistency is good :)

Thanks for satisfying my curiosity!

-- 
Seeya,
Paul
--
	It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
   but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
	 If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 21 16:58:53 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.