Re: java and svn_notify_func_t and large files

>
>
>I would even go a step further and provide a two-way callback in which
>the client could return FALSE to stop the command. Because right now
>it's not possible to stop a command (at least without killing the thread
>and leaving memory leaks).
>
I would go as far as saying that the ability to interrupt a command is
more important than
increased callback frequency. When the "cancel" button is pressed the
svn operation better
stop quickly :)

I didn't find an issue for this, should I enter one?
Jean-Michel

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 20 02:03:45 2002