--- kbrannen@gte.net wrote:
> Noel Yap wrote:
> >
> > I think it makes sense for "svn cat file" to
> behave
> > like "svn cat -r BASE file" rather than "svn cat
> -r
> > HEAD file". Such behaviour makes even more sense
> if
> > blame were implemented through "svn cat -v".
> Doing so
> > would also make the command more consistent with
> other
> > commands like "svn diff".
>
> I disagree. I can see where "svn cat -r BASE file"
> might be useful at times,
> but the way I work, "svn cat -r HEAD file" is always
> what I mean when I think
> "svn cat file".
>
> We obviously work differently. :-)
When you do "svn diff file", do you mean "svn diff -r
BASE file" or "svn diff -r HEAD file"? IMHO, for
consistency's sake, "svn cat file" should mean the
"svn cat -r BASE file".
Or, when you do "cvs ann file", do you want "cvs ann
-r BASE file" or "cvs ann -r HEAD file"?
Since I'm not the one implementing this feature, I'll
leave it up to the implementer to decide.
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 14 12:08:14 2002