Re: svn status: does not notice changed file if timestamp of "new" file is older
From: <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-11-13 20:25:59 CET
solo turn <soloturn99@yahoo.com> writes:
> no, the scenario involves a checkout:
I did this on Win98, and it looks correct to me. Is my recipe wrong?
--- C:\TEMP>deltree wc1 wc2 Delete directory "wc1" and all its subdirectories? [yn] y Deleting wc1... Delete directory "wc2" and all its subdirectories? [yn] y Deleting wc2... C:\TEMP>svn co http://192.168.0.100/tests/.greek-repo wc1 A wc1/iota A wc1/A A wc1/A/mu A wc1/A/D A wc1/A/D/gamma A wc1/A/D/H A wc1/A/D/H/omega A wc1/A/D/H/chi A wc1/A/D/H/psi A wc1/A/D/G A wc1/A/D/G/tau A wc1/A/D/G/pi A wc1/A/D/G/rho A wc1/A/C A wc1/A/B A wc1/A/B/lambda A wc1/A/B/F A wc1/A/B/E A wc1/A/B/E/beta A wc1/A/B/E/alpha Checked out revision 1. C:\TEMP>echo "lalala" > wc1\foo C:\TEMP>copy wc1\foo . 1 file(s) copied C:\TEMP>echo "bobobo" >> wc1\foo C:\TEMP>svn add wc1/foo A wc1/foo C:\TEMP>svn ci -m "adding lalalabobobo foo" wc1 Adding wc1/foo Transmitting file data . Committed revision 2. C:\TEMP>svn co http://192.168.0.100/tests/.greek-repo wc2 A wc2/foo A wc2/iota A wc2/A A wc2/A/mu A wc2/A/D A wc2/A/D/gamma A wc2/A/D/H A wc2/A/D/H/omega A wc2/A/D/H/chi A wc2/A/D/H/psi A wc2/A/D/G A wc2/A/D/G/tau A wc2/A/D/G/pi A wc2/A/D/G/rho A wc2/A/C A wc2/A/B A wc2/A/B/lambda A wc2/A/B/F A wc2/A/B/E A wc2/A/B/E/beta A wc2/A/B/E/alpha Checked out revision 2. C:\TEMP>copy .\foo wc2\foo 1 file(s) copied C:\TEMP>svn st wc2 M wc2/foo C:\TEMP> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Wed Nov 13 20:28:55 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.