Re: Subverion Performance Tests

Brandon Ehle <azverkan@yahoo.com> writes:

> Fixed my suite of performance tests and reran them. Added a couple
> more performance tests. These tests are ra_local vs local cvs dir.
> The results are the averages over 3 runs. The perf test code is
> available at:

[snip]

> As you can see, CVS is still faster by a large margin.

Have you done any profiling to identify the problem? I've run
oprofile on httpd in the past, and it was internal BDB mutex functions
that took the vast majority (>90%) of the time.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org