>Done in revision 3728. Note the log message there; if you give your
>name, I can tweak it to use that instead.
ok, seems I'm not up to date :)
No need to insert my name for that - I actually did nothing but suggesting
what obviously was already done.
>I think an svn_initialize() would make sense when it would do more
>than just wrap apr_initialize(). But right now, that's all it would
>do; the body of the function would literally be one line long.
Yes, right now it would be one line long. But think about the
possibility that subversion one day needs more libraries which
also need initialization. Then the subversion API wouldn't need
to change and probably clients would also not necessarily need
a change...
Steve
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 11 20:57:10 2002