Re: Defining branch life-cycles in subversion

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 08 November 2002 07:51, Greg Dickie wrote:
> but doing the commits after each pset strikes me as wierd.

If that's the only problem, then you can do "pset" directly on the branch URL
and avoid the separate commit. It will still be a commit, but it only
requires a single command.

$ svn pset branch-status in-review http://server/branch/foo -m "Commit
message."

The argument to -m would be somthing like "Tech Mananger Johnny is currently
reviewing the branch."

By using versioned properties, everyone can see exactly when Johnny started
reviewing, and if any changes were made between when the review started and
when it ends, then Johnny would be able to see that too (for example).
Really, unversioned properties are just a bad idea when versioned properties
have only advantages.

- --
Peter Davis
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE9y+H9hDAgUT1yirARAgpdAJ48GM0JB5Lr4GorZyVbqZJE1l/oqwCdGMxY
CcVzKJKqiIzMs1XTTXBD9WU=
=4GD6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Nov 8 17:11:25 2002