Re: [Issue 972] Changed - Neon incorrectly configured for SSL

Blair Zajac writes:
> + I'm pretty certain that configure passes all configure options down to
> + sub configures. Also, I configure my svn with

Thanks, Blair! I hadn't realized that. (And good idea about taking
it to the mailing list.)

Do we pass all configure options down to subconfigures,
unconditionally, or just unconsumed configure options? At first
glance, this seemed weird to me -- what if a flag means different
things to different configures? But I guess it's okay, because
`configure' scripts are really all supporting different subsets of the
same interface, being generated by autoconf.

However, Mark: note that you were passing

   --with-ssl=/subversion/openssl

According to Neon's help, `--with-ssl' doesn't take an =foo argument,
it's just a standalone flag. So I think (?) it can't be used the way
you're trying to use it.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Nov 7 18:36:17 2002