[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: svn cat (was: Re: svn up -p)

From: Noel Yap <yap_noel_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2002-11-06 22:06:21 CET

--- Benjamin Pflugmann <benjamin-svn-dev@pflugmann.de>
wrote:
> Maybe the different opinions come from why we use
> blame. I use cvs
> annotate just as what I described, a more
> informative listing of the
> file at hand.

Just today, I used "cvs ann", not to see who broke
something, but rather to see when code was last
changed. The fact that it hadn't been touched since
before Y2k meant to me that it was stable and the
problem I'm hunting down most probably existed
elsewhere. I think creating "svn cat -v" or "svn cat
--verbose" in place of "svn blame" would make the
command have a more exact meaning to its functionality
(with the PCness to boot :-).

Noel

__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Nov 6 22:07:32 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.