RE: Re: patch suggestion

I agree as well. There are several forms of multi-threaded programming
that migrate user contexts between differing threads of execution.
Relying on a particular model would be annoying.

Bill

----
Do you want a dangerous fugitive staying in your flat?
No.
Well, don't upset him and he'll be a nice fugitive staying in your flat.
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg Hudson [mailto:ghudson@MIT.EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 11:09 PM
> To: Branko Cibej
> Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Re: patch suggestion
> 
> On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 15:15, Branko Čibej wrote:
> > Not exactly. It's a per-thread global variable (assuming different
> > threads use separate global pools, which they'd be insane not to),
and
> > in this case I believe it makes sense.
> 
> So, as I understand your reasoning, you think there should be multiple
> contexts, but you can't use one context in multiple threads, or
multiple
> contexts in one thread?  I think you're assuming a very specific model
> of threaded programming, and we shouldn't be so inflexible.
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org