Peter Davis wrote:
>On Tuesday 05 November 2002 09:19, Karl Fogel wrote:
>
>
>>If we're feeling
>>evil, we could generalize it to an option that allows you to specify
>>an alternate configuration, too :-).
>>
>>
>
>I wouldn't see anything wrong with
>
>$ svn --config /path/to/config ...
>
>which is something lots of programs allow.
>
But, but... which configuration is that? The "servers" file, or the
"config" file? Or would that be /path/to/config/directory, with the file
names remaining the same?
Of course, --no-config would work in any case.
The funny thing is, though, that we can't add such an option. We have to
pass the context parameter down the call chain first, and move the
config file reading from the libraries into the client, because the
client is the only bit that sees command-line options. Wheee...
>Besides, implementing this might
>stop the "Re: patch suggestion" flamewar going on right now :)
>
Man, if that were a flame war, your mail reader wold've melted by now. :-)
Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 5 22:02:33 2002