[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: patch suggestion

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2002-11-05 20:51:34 CET

"Ich Selbst" <ichselbst@gmx.ch> writes:

> > I mentioned it two posts back in this thread. It involves passing a
> > context baton to all functions that need configuration. Then the client
> > can decide how to fill that context.
>
> I don't think that's an 'easy' way.

That this will be "difficult" has been mentioned a few times now, but
I don't think making such a change is that hard. Just change the
low-level function declaration and the compiler tells you everywhere
that needs to change, change those and repeat until you reach the top
level. Yes, it may affect lots of lines of code, but the change is
fairly mechanical, the same context baton just gets passed through.
Should be far easier than adding access batons :)

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Nov 5 20:52:22 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.