Re: svn commit: rev 3626 - trunk/subversion/include trunk/subversion/libsvn_ra_local trunk/subversion/libsvn_repos

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> Yeah, they're similar, but I think easier for humans to read.

Agreed.

> > Btw, did you want comments at this stage, or should we keep quiet
> > until you ask for feedback?
>
> If you have comments, go for it.

My only comments (aside from a general "I like it!") are two tentative
questions:

I see there's an "editor command set" planned. How closely will
editor semantics be tied into the protocol? I'm not sure what's good
or bad here, just curious about how you're thinking.

And, regarding the initial exchange of supported protocol versions,
would a detailed feature exchange be better? That's the way CVS went;
I don't have enough experience with protocol implementation to say for
sure that it's better, but people who do generally seem to prefer
verbose feature exchanges over terse version exchanges (I think).

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Nov 4 19:13:57 2002