Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
>
> Branko ÄŒibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>
> > Branko ÄŒibej wrote:
> >
> > >Philip Martin wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>So I think it affects BDB 4.0 as well as 4.1, this will affect lots of
> > >>people. Perhaps we should pull the 0.14.4 tarball?
> > >>
> > >I agree absolutely. In the meantime, Ben, please try the attached patch.
> > >It moves the logic for testing several lib names from configure.in to
> > >SVN_LIB_BERKELEY_DB in ac-helpers/berkeley-db.m4.
> > >
> > I just noticed right now on svn-breakage that the build is indeed broken
> > on platforms that _don't_ use -ldb4. This is a showstopper. Please let's
> > recall 0.14.4 until this is resolved.
>
> Dangit, what the heck?!
>
> Karl *tested* my berkeley-db.m4 changes on his redhat box before I
> committed. He's has BDB 4.0 installed /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.4.0/. I
> watched him run ./autogen.sh; ./configure, and saw four -ldb4 checks
> fail non-fatally, and then the third -ldb worked.
>
> How could this have happened? I still don't understand why the logic
> is failing. Maybe I'm distracted by the steam coming out of my
> ears. :-(
Which version of RedHat? I'm using 8.0 and couldn't force a link against
DB 4.1 easily until I uninstalled db4-devel.
Best,
Blair
--
Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com>
Web and OS performance plots - http://www.orcaware.com/orca/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 30 02:46:51 2002