Re: kill BK (Re: who is "we"? project goals (was: Re: Svn as a changeset engine.))

On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 03:03:26PM -0700, Tom Lord wrote:
>
>
> Well, kfogel and collabnet "win" the email thread. I will, of
> course, drop the topic.
>
> People interested in change-set mgt., BK killing, and, who knows,
> perhaps the possibility of forking svn might want to look into the
> still-surviving arch forks (the -users mailing list seems to be an
> emerging sync hub).
>
> http://www.fifthvision.net/open/bin/view/Arch

The value of change-set mgmt and resolving the BK issue are quite noble.
I would hate though for the subversion project to fracture.

I would encourage folks to focus on walking before running. By walking
I mean supplant cvs, by running I mean supplant BK/ClearCase/TrueChange/etc...

We wont get to supplanting BK et al until we achieve capabilities on par
or superior than CVS.

Just $0.02 from a list lurker...

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
    John Cavanaugh Agilent Technologies
    R&D Program Manager 1400 Fountaingrove Pkwy
    Wireless Network Solutions Santa Rosa, CA 95403-1799

    Email: cavanaug@soco.agilent.com Phone: 707-577-4780
                                                707-577-3948 (Fax)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
           Whatever you can do, or dream you can, begin it.
           Boldness has genius, power, and magic in it.
                                                    -- Goethe
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Oct 16 00:24:25 2002