Re: kill BK (Re: who is "we"? project goals (was: Re: Svn as a changeset engine.))

Tom Lord <lord@regexps.com> writes:
> You'd think that simplifying the 1.0 agenda in light of deeper
> understanding of the technology plus current events in the wacky wacky
> world of revision control would be an attractive option to consider.
> Let's find a short-term plan to kill BK, for example.

Wrong project -- try arch, maybe?

We're not here to replace BK, we're here to replace CVS.

> Ob Free Software Nut Comment: BitMover is actively sabotaging the
> free software community -- the community is in crisis. There are
> ethical reasons to step away from your current plans.

Enough. This is really grasping.

Tom, you tried your best to change Subversion's direction. You didn't
persuade us. Fine, no problem -- happens all the time. Now you have
several choices: you can give up on the whole thing, you can fork
Subversion, or you can contribute to the plan that this developer
community has agreed on.

Continuing to post and repost the *same* rejected proposal is not an
option, however. Please stop.

(I'm going to stop responding now; I encourage others to do the same.)

-K

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 15 23:27:15 2002