RE: kill BK (Re: who is "we"? project goals (was: Re: Svn as a changeset engine.))

> From: Tom Lord [mailto:lord@regexps.com]
> Sent: 15 October 2002 23:18

> > I do think that replacing BK is important for the OSS
> > community, but if you deliver an uncomplete (or not usable
> > for this very important purpose that is the LK) software, you
> > will just increase BK supporters ("Look, OS Community cannot
> > even make a SCM good enough for the kernel!").
>
> I don't care what they say on /. I do care what a small number of
> senior engineers at the unix vendors say. The latter group is smart
> enough to evaluate architectures, code quality, and future prospects,
> and incorporate their findings into their planning. The former group
> -- well, they talk a lot.

Speaking of which, I wouldn't mind you talking a bit less...

Subversion won't go in a different direction, no matter how much vocal
effort you put into it. Deal with it.

Sander

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Oct 15 23:24:19 2002