--- Paul Lussier <pll@lanminds.com> wrote:
> If he had done something as simple as used rcs
> within clearcase,
> everything would have been fine. When I saw that BK
> essentially allows
> for exactly that type of behavior I almost cried :)
> Now, I'm not
> saying BK is the best there is, or that it's
> flawless, just that one
> feature is something I've never heard of anywhere
> else, and I see it
> as being a potentially huge benefit to a lot of
> people, and I don't
> see that svn has that on the roadmap either, since
> at this point, svn,
> being simply a better CVS, is inherently a
> centralized system.
> Maybe this is something that can be changed in the
> 2.0 track?
In my current environment, task branches are a no-no
(since they're a pain in CVS). Being able to work off
a local copy of the repo would essentially create a
local task branch thereby allowing me to checkin early
and often while not affecting the rest of the
repository users. Of course, Subversion lends itself
better to supporting task branches, but you can still
count my vote in for this feature being in 2.0 since
the feature would also help offline work.
MTC,
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Faith Hill - Exclusive Performances, Videos & More
http://faith.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 13 05:15:09 2002