Re: non-interactive user authentication

Scott Lamb wrote:

> Branko Čibej wrote:
>
>>> Not yet, but it would be pretty easy to add a --non-interactive long
>>> option (it could also be a ~/.subversion/config option, though that's
>>> less important than having it available via the command line for
>>> scripts).
>>
>>
>> Please don't ... aargh, you already have. I think this was a bad
>> move. It's better to fix the code than to add yet another option: If
>> you already passed a --username and --password, or if your url is
>> http://user:pass@foo/..., then why on earth would you have to pass
>> --non-interactive to suppress the password dialogue, too?
>
>
> How do you say "fail if authentication is required" otherwise?

It should be as simple as providing an empy username and/or passworkd
via the existing options.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org