Branko Čibej wrote:
>> Not yet, but it would be pretty easy to add a --non-interactive long
>> option (it could also be a ~/.subversion/config option, though that's
>> less important than having it available via the command line for
>> scripts).
>
> Please don't ... aargh, you already have. I think this was a bad move.
> It's better to fix the code than to add yet another option: If you
> already passed a --username and --password, or if your url is
> http://user:pass@foo/..., then why on earth would you have to pass
> --non-interactive to suppress the password dialogue, too?
How do you say "fail if authentication is required" otherwise?
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Oct 6 08:27:37 2002