Re: CVS2SVN - Thoughts for RPMs?

"Brent R. Matzelle" <bmatzelle@yahoo.com> writes:

> > Right now I've got the Subversion RPM building another binary
> > package
> > called subversion-cvs2svn which depends on the swig RPMs. Is that
> > OK? Or
> > would people (users) rather not have another RPM package and just
> > add
> > another dependency to the base Subversion RPM?
>
> I wouldn't want SWIG as a dependency for Subversion so I'd say keep
> it as a separate package.

Yeah, that discussion came up earlier (with respect to whether or not
we should lose svnlook and svnadmin and just have SWIGpy scripts), and
folks seemed to not want YASD (Yet Another Subversion Dependency).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 25 15:22:54 2002