[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: CVS2SVN - Thoughts for RPMs?

From: Brent R. Matzelle <bmatzelle_at_yahoo.com>
Date: 2002-09-25 15:14:24 CEST

--- David Summers <david@summersoft.fay.ar.us> wrote:
> I still haven't gotten cvs2svn to work yet but it compiles great.
> Does it
> require the new apache-2.0.42 to work?
> I'm getting ready to commit my changes to the Subversion RPMs and
> wanted
> to get people's thoughts on cvs2svn/swig, etc., requirements.
> Right now I've got the Subversion RPM building another binary
> package
> called subversion-cvs2svn which depends on the swig RPMs. Is that
> OK? Or
> would people (users) rather not have another RPM package and just
> add
> another dependency to the base Subversion RPM?

I wouldn't want SWIG as a dependency for Subversion so I'd say keep
it as a separate package.


Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Sep 25 15:15:01 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.