[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] (alternate fix for issue 900)

From: Branko Čibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-09-14 02:49:34 CEST

mark benedetto king wrote:

>Bill Tutt convinced me that adding svn_error_cause() was not a good
>idea (people might be tempted to use it). I've inlined it instead.
>As an added benefit, the scope of the patch is reduced.
This is the wrong approach, regardless. We're wrapping the error chain
already, and svn_handle_error will print out the whole chain. So the
original "cause" should be apparent. Why isn't it?

Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Sep 14 02:50:14 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.