Re: [PATCH] (alternate fix for issue 900)

mark benedetto king wrote:

>Bill Tutt convinced me that adding svn_error_cause() was not a good
>idea (people might be tempted to use it). I've inlined it instead.
>As an added benefit, the scope of the patch is reduced.
>
>
This is the wrong approach, regardless. We're wrapping the error chain
already, and svn_handle_error will print out the whole chain. So the
original "cause" should be apparent. Why isn't it?

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org