[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Corrupted update

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-09-03 20:01:44 CEST

Blair Zajac <blair@orcaware.com> writes:
> There was a Norton AntiVirus Enterprise scan going at the same time as
> the upgrade, no telling if that had an effect.
>
> It looks like the repo was around 3095. I had another checked out svn
> tree and tried the same upgrade, but that one worked, so it looks like
> it was specific to this tree.
>
> Unfortunately, I didn't have a copy of the tree before the upgrade.
>
> The tree has just been upgraded over time, so coming up with a recipe
> may be hard.

Urk. Umm, okay, thanks anyway.

What does 'svn st' say? Is the file's text base is corrupted in the
same way, or is it just the working file? And if you run md5sum on
the text base, does the result match the checksum given in the
.svn/entries file?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Sep 3 20:22:26 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.