[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: annotate vs blame

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-29 23:54:01 CEST

Bill Newcomb <nuke@juniper.net> writes:

> How about 'svn credits', like a movie? Or maybe 'svn thanks' (can be
> intoned sarcastically for tree breakages and such).

As someone mentioned earlier, this command is used not just to find
out who wrote each line, but also *when* the line was written. So
'credits' sounds too people-oriented to me.

(Luckily, in Subversion's case, all of this information can be summed
up by placing a single revision number next to each line, yummy.)

How about a simple 'svn analyze'?

Hm, I can't believe I'm responding to this thread. This command
doesn't even *exist* yet!

Since the logo contest is almost over, maybe we should follow up with
a "name the subcommand" contest? :-)

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 29 23:55:48 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.