[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: annotate vs blame

From: Paul Smith <pausmith_at_nortelnetworks.com>
Date: 2002-08-29 22:19:57 CEST

%% Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:

  gr> Noel Yap wrote:

>> Like I said before, IMHO, blame is counter-productive
>> due to its negative connotations.
>> Does anyone else feel either way about the name for
>> this functionality?

  gr> i think 'svn blame' is a lot more descriptive than 'svn annotate',
  gr> i think it's more appropriate considering the most common use case
  gr> for the command (like cmike, i often use it to see who wrote the
  gr> buggy code i'm correcting so i can yell at them), and i think it's
  gr> a hell of a lot more amusing.

Yah, but don'tcha just hate it when it turns out it was you who wrote
it? That always crushes my buzz.

I know! We should have "svn assign-blame"! That's even more useful I

 Paul D. Smith <pausmith@nortelnetworks.com> HASMAT--HA Software Mthds & Tools
 "Please remain calm...I may be mad, but I am a professional." --Mad Scientist
   These are my opinions---Nortel Networks takes no responsibility for them.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 29 22:21:13 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.