Would you instead possibly consider placing this under the same license as
everything else in the repository, a BSD-based license? Quid pro quo, and
all that.
Brian
On 27 Aug 2002, Jon Trowbridge wrote:
> License exceptions are only needed for things with licenses that aren't
> GPL-compatible.
>
> Neon is LGPL and zlib's license is a very loose, public-domainy sort of
> thing, so those aren't problems.
>
> However, I had forgotten about OpenSSL, whose license is the bane of
> GPLed projects everywhere. :) And I wasn't aware of the existence of
> apr-iconv. I'm told that it is possible to get the Gtk+ 2.0 python
> bindings working on Win32, so it could become an issue someday.
>
> I'll update the gsvn legal boilerplate to include exceptions for these
> two libraries. Thanks for pointing them out.
>
> -JT
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Aug 28 02:52:26 2002