[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Ignored vs. Unversioned

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2002-08-25 23:50:41 CEST

Jon Trowbridge <trow@ximian.com> writes:

> Yes, I understand that. What I'm saying is that it would be useful if,
> while not ignoring any files, there was some indicatation of which of
> the files would have been ignored if no_ignore had been FALSE.

I see now, sorry it took so long.

> The comments in svn_wc.h (unless I've misinterpreted them) say that this
> should happen, by setting the text status of files that would have been
> ignored to svn_wc_status_none. However, it isn't happening.

The comments in svn_wc.h (assuming you mean svn_wc_statuses) are
obviously incomplete, they don't mention NO_IGNORE :-( So it's
difficult to say whether you misinterpreted them.

Philip, notes we missed the chance to have an option --ignore-ignore
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sun Aug 25 23:51:22 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.