Re: Ignored vs. Unversioned

Jon Trowbridge <trow@ximian.com> writes:

> Yes, I understand that. What I'm saying is that it would be useful if,
> while not ignoring any files, there was some indicatation of which of
> the files would have been ignored if no_ignore had been FALSE.

I see now, sorry it took so long.

>
> The comments in svn_wc.h (unless I've misinterpreted them) say that this
> should happen, by setting the text status of files that would have been
> ignored to svn_wc_status_none. However, it isn't happening.

The comments in svn_wc.h (assuming you mean svn_wc_statuses) are
obviously incomplete, they don't mention NO_IGNORE :-( So it's
difficult to say whether you misinterpreted them.

--
Philip, notes we missed the chance to have an option --ignore-ignore
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org