Greg Stein <gstein@lyra.org> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 11:38:25AM -0500, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==?= <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >
> > > Do we need a post-change-unversioned-item hook?
> >
> > Hahaha! I just typing a mail to suggest that, though my scope was
> > smaller: log-message-changed hook.
>
> Oh, bleck. *Any* revision property can change, and those need to be backed
> up. We don't want a hook for this and that and, oh, that other property.
>
> Thus, you have a single hook like Brane mentioned (named as he suggests, or
> maybe rev-prop-changed or somesuch).
Yeah, that's a better granularity. No need to special case a
particular revision property. Just don't want all-things-unversioned
to get slammed through a single hook.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 22 20:49:33 2002