[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: expected failures shouldn't raise alarms

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-22 20:23:01 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> >Oooooh. I find that a bit confusing, because I think of the "X"
> >prefix as standing for "eXpected", where as in XPASS it stands for
> >"uneXpected".
> Yup, it's confusing, but it's more or less standard (IIRC it's even a
> POSIX stantard for test suites, have too look it up -- the dejagnu
> documentation says something about that).

Okay, I bow to the wisdom of the ages.

> Right. I'm on it.

Thanks, 'preciate it.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 22 20:41:48 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.