[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: expected failures shouldn't raise alarms

From: Branko ─îibej <brane_at_xbc.nu>
Date: 2002-08-22 13:30:11 CEST

Branko ─îibej wrote:

> Perhaps. This isn't just about issue tracking, it's also about
> enhancing the test suite. There were 9 tests in thre that were
> disabled, and most of those were not even implemented -- which means
> somebody thought they'd be a good idea, then forgot about them.
> There's nothing in the issue tracker about those tests. :-)

Ah, I take that back, seeing issue 877. :-)

Brane ─îibej   <brane_at_xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 22 13:30:52 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.