Re: Confusing syntax

Karl Fogel wrote:
> Re: switching to Python: +0, but that's kind of a separate thing.
> We need to continue maintaining the C programs until then. Besides,
> patching the C progs to have consistent invocation syntax is pretty
> trivial.

How about switching to Perl instead? SWIG can generate bindings for
it, and it's available in places where Python is not.

...

Now while you are twisting your face and thinking of a presentable
reason why it shouldn't be Perl, I'd like to slip in my real point:

C is nice, let's not swap it for scripting-language-of-the-day.

-- Naked

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 15 21:08:04 2002