[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Issue 533] New - implement reserved checkouts

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-13 19:07:10 CEST

Karl Fogel <kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net> writes:

> Branko ─îibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> > 1. A lock must not create a new revision.
>
> Is this really a requirement? I used to think so, but now I'm not so
> sure.
>
> The two reasons I've heard so far are:
>
> 1. It causes noise in the logs and in the commit emails.
> 2. It "uses up" revision numbers, or makes them less meaningful.

If locks were regular versioned properties, I guess I'd be annoyed at
running 'svn up' and seeing millions of "_U" codes come down every
day. It somehow violates my intuition about locks; I feel like locks
should be a super-lightweight communications system, just an ephermal
layer smoothly floating above the filesystem. They're not important
enough to record and remember over time. Do I *really* care that on a
certain date, certain people were communicating in a certain way? Not
me, at least. Versioning the state of the communication system feels
way too heavy and cumbersome to me.

Just my gut feeling.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Aug 13 19:08:40 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.