[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: SVN is not truly distributed?

From: Steven Shaw <steven_shaw_at_iprimus.com.au>
Date: 2002-08-08 12:42:09 CEST

Stellation?

There seem to be afew configuration mangagement systems on the brew at the
moment: subversion, opencm, stellation ....

I've read a bit about OpenCM. It has had support for disconnected commits
(aka commit to local repository). Unfortunately that functionality has been
disabled in the initial public release (pending a stable version, I think).
It uses Xdelta compression although doesn't seem to use Josh MacDonald's
library but reimplements a slightly altered algorithm. The systems makes
heavy use of cryptographic hashes (for globally unique names). In opencm
there is no server-side support for directories. I think this is opencm's
primary weakness. I think this leads to a bloated repository (which one one
report I read was being fixed? with compression/gzip). I could be way wrong.
The information at their website is a good read. It probably holds useful
information for Subversion gurus who want to think about adding distributed
operation.

I'll be sure to check out the Stellation homepage, too!

Cheers, Steve.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 12 18:32:06 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.