Re: Working copy locks and client errors.

On Sun, 2002-08-11 at 18:57, Philip Martin wrote:
> Does this sound sensible?

This sounds reasonably. Another approach would be to set a flag in the
lock indicating that it's currently protecting the running of a log
file; that seems perhaps cleaner to me but more error-prone; your answer
is probably better.

I think that would let us eliminate a bunch of cleanup code in libsvn_wc
as well (though entry caching should come before any other code
rototilling, of course).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Aug 12 04:44:15 2002