[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: merge should copy-with-history

From: Karl Fogel <kfogel_at_newton.ch.collab.net>
Date: 2002-08-08 07:22:11 CEST

Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
> That's on the stack, but it's not easy to do for (non-empty)
> directories. We want to get the "svn merge" semantics right ASAP; in
> time for 0.14.1, and fiddle with the WC functions later.

Just a meta-comment:

If by "semantics" you mean the notification output that's currently
hosed, then +1.

If you mean something deeper about merge, something that's not been
right for a long time, then there's no need for 0.14.1 to wait on it.
Most bugs are in Subversion now were there in our previous tarball,
there are just fewer of them now. But we don't have to fix
*everything* before releasing a tarball -- it just has to be an
improvement over the last one :-).

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Aug 8 07:38:05 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.