Re: Mysterious "Transaction is out of date" error

On Monday 05 August 2002 10:23, cmpilato@collab.net wrote:
> > > svn add a
> > > touch a/b
> > > svn add a/b
> > > svn commit -m 'add stuff'
> > > echo zog >> a/b
> > > svn commit -m 'extend a/b'
>
> Note that if right here you add 'svn up', the bug disappears. Why?
> Because that will cause both 'a' and 'a/b' to have the same revision.
> That, in turn, causes the commit driver to issue only a single add of
> 'c' as a copy of 'a', which will, as before, include 'a/b'.

Since 'a' (and thus 'c') is not at HEAD, shouldn't this fail like it does with
other out-of-date-not-at-HEAD files? Or maybe that's the whole problem...

> > > svn cp a c
> > > svn commit -m 'duplicate directory'

-- 
Peter Davis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org