hey
Karl Fogel wrote:
> brane@xbc.nu writes:
> > I think it's a total waste of time to hack up some sort of locking, only to
> > throw it away when we do it for real. Any locking scheme would have to be
> > understood by the filesystem -- a locked item should not be added to a commit
> > txn -- and that support would be the major part of the effort, and
> > must be done correctly the first time.
>
> That locking should be understood at the libsvn_repos layer I totally
> agree. But should it be all the way down in libsvn_fs?
>
My .000002
To me it seems it belongs at the FS level. When/how to use locks "may" be a repo
level function. The lock itself does seem to belong in the FS. It feels like
maybe it needs to be managed at the dir entry level as opposed to the file level.
You should still be able to commit to a branch even if head is locked. Right?
gat
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Aug 2 17:57:19 2002