Re: rapidsvn feedback
From: RADICS Peter <mitch_at_platon.lbcons.net>
Date: 2002-08-01 12:36:46 CEST
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 10:26:16PM +0200, Branko Čibej wrote:
[SNIP] // some talk about update and switch
> >I think that on the
Yes, this would be really nice!
> Ah, you can't do that. That's because we don't enforce a particular
[SNIP]
but you don't have to force anything. here's an idea (probly after 1.0):
this information could contain the default tag and branch directory structure
if this policy information is not awailable, then svn tag/branch could just
this would lead to the same flexibility that we have now with regards to
I don't know what's the best way to communicate this information to the client,
What do you all think?
regards,
ps: please CC me to the reply, 'cos I'm not on the list
-- // Radics Peter <mitch_at_lbcons.net> (http://lbcons.net) // // "If human beings don't keep exercising their lips, // their brains start working." -- Ford Prefect --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Thu Aug 1 19:51:31 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.