Re: file:// -> svn://

On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 10:07:43AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> cmpilato@red-bean.com writes:
> > I hate to say it, but I'm +1 on changing file:// to our own registered
> > (or practically-registered-by-way-of-unique-use) protocol scheme.
>
> +0 from here. It's not causing *us* a problem, right now, but we're
> violating a standard unnecessarily. Maybe it's causing confusion.
>
> How about
>
> svnlocal://path/into/repository/.../

-0.5, i don't want to have to type more characters, and i don't think
this confusion is going to be a big deal.

-garrett

-- 
garrett rooney                    Remember, any design flaw you're 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net      sufficiently snide about becomes  
http://electricjellyfish.net/     a feature.       -- Dan Sugalski
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org