[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Beta timeframe

From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz_at_apache.org>
Date: 2002-07-29 18:45:21 CEST

On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 11:14:41AM -0500, Karl Fogel wrote:
> Yeah, I know what you mean. Even the smallest change cascades through
> so many layers...
> Well, if you can give us an idea of your schedule, we'll be better
> able to plan. We *would* like to get it in 1.0, though exactly how
> much coding time we can shift to it is still an open question.

Since I can't reproduce the Darwin SVN hang anymore (I think due to
the inclusion of -O2 in my current builds), I'm now trying to work on
my libtool replacement so that I can get builds of SVN to take
something less than a hour on Darwin. Once I can get the builds to
become faster, then I'll play with svn-config trying to get the right
logic in-place to handle in-tree dependencies. Then, I'll start
working on the libsvn_wc changes.

I'm slowly making progress on my libtool clone, so I'm hoping by the
end of this week, I'm starting to tackle the libsvn_wc problem. I'd
hazard a guess that it would take about another week to get the
libsvn_wc changes into the branch. Then, it needs to be merged back
into the trunk and vetted.

All of this presupposes that I don't get nailed by something over
in httpd-land. Hopefully, that gives a better picture of my todo
list... -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 29 18:46:11 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.