Re: "svn ls" too complex?

Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> writes:
> i'd be in favor of having the current behaviour be the 'svn ls -l'
> variant, and having the default just list the filenames.
>
> would anyone have a problem with that? if not i'll change it tonight.

We don't support subcommand-specific options.

CMike's suggestion to use -v seems good to me, though.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 29 17:47:38 2002