Re: "svn ls" too complex?
From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2002-07-29 17:10:46 CEST
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:33:36AM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
i'd be in favor of having the current behaviour be the 'svn ls -l'
would anyone have a problem with that? if not i'll change it tonight.
-garrett
-- garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Mon Jul 29 17:11:19 2002 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.