[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: "svn ls" too complex?

From: Garrett Rooney <rooneg_at_electricjellyfish.net>
Date: 2002-07-29 17:10:46 CEST

On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:33:36AM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> Is there a way to use "svn ls" to simply display a list of the
> directory entries at a given Subversion URL? This is what scripts
> need, after all.
> Is there a reason that this isn't the default behavior, for
> consistency with the Unix command?

i'd be in favor of having the current behaviour be the 'svn ls -l'
variant, and having the default just list the filenames.

would anyone have a problem with that? if not i'll change it tonight.


garrett rooney                    Remember, any design flaw you're 
rooneg@electricjellyfish.net      sufficiently snide about becomes  
http://electricjellyfish.net/     a feature.       -- Dan Sugalski
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Jul 29 17:11:19 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.