[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: argh

From: Justin Erenkrantz <jerenkrantz_at_apache.org>
Date: 2002-07-26 00:47:09 CEST

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 06:38:19PM -0400, Michael Price wrote:
> $ /tmp/tmp> svn co file:///tmp/tmp/repo/a file:///tmp/tmp/repo/b
> Checked out revision 1.

Heh. This is sort of related to my concerns about how co now works.
My (conceptual) take is that this would check out *two*
repositories - not place the contents of repo/a into the directory
file:///tmp/tmp/repo/b. I didn't even think of testing this case.

The assertion raised earlier was that you could detect when a
URI is passed as the second parameter, but that isn't really
possible as what may seem like a URL is really what the user wants.

I still maintain that the new co syntax is confused. -- justin

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jul 26 00:47:53 2002

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.